i am a fan of the suze orman show on CNBC every weekend at 5pm-6pm.
this show is very US focused, but i find it very interesting to listen to the financial predicament that people find themselves in.
a point that suze made today - again - note this is pertaining to the US market - is that she does not recommend loaded mutual funds, where the typical load (in the US) is at 5%. In comparison, note that it is much higher in Malaysia at 5.5%-6.5% for the equity/balanced type fund. Suze strongly recommends no-load mutual funds. I don't even think we have this in Malaysia. She also made a comment that she looks for management expense ratios of less than 1%. Typically, most of the balanced/equity type funds have a MER of 1.5%.
This got me thinking .... what are the greatest fixed & variable costs that these companies have to warrant a 1.5% MER, whereas the companies in the US are charging <1%. Does this simply increase their profits?
